Wednesday, August 31, 2011

Nutjob Comment of the day: 8/31/2011

Found this gem when I was researching the “Electric Fast” post.  It was posted in the YouTube comment section for the Mini E run on the Nürburgring.  Now, it is a year old, but it just aged so nicely that I had to use it.

Let's hope it will take ages before these cars enter reality of our lives. The battery is already the worst mechanical (well, organic actually) device, so adding a car with these unreliable things, is really no progress. There has been virtually nog progress since the last 50 years, when it comes to regular batteries. It's still outdated techniques, and it will remain that way.

Posted about a year ago on YouTube.

I wonder if this guy uses lead acid batteries in his laptop?  Maybe he grows his own, after all they are organic.

Electric Fast

Just how exciting could an electric car possibly be?  I mean seriously, what comes to mind when you hear the phrase, “Performance EV?”  The Prius?  The hybrid version of the Camry or Fusion?  There is some progress.  Tesla broke new ground with their roadster and Honda has the more affordable CRZ hybrid.

But what can they do?  I mean really do?

Maybe they should throw them around the Nürburgring.  Mini, Peugeot and Toyota did and all with impressive results.

The first was BMW with a modified version of the Mini E.  They did it on December 4, 2010 and set a record for an electric vehicle on this course.  Sure, they were the first, but a record is a record.  Here’s their run:

Mini begins the assault on the “Ring”

Okay, it is a Mini and the soundtrack is horrible.  But it is a purpose built performance run and not just tooling around.  It’s impressive .

Then Peugeot got into it with their EX1 concept car.  Concept seems to be a misnomer since the car was built and pretty much wrung out on this course.  This run was made on April 27, 2011.  Below is the highlight video of their run.

Peugeot takes on the “Ring”

Now we just keep getting faster, and looking at this one, it should go faster.  Just because . . . well it just does.  And it did.  The odd thing is you see this thing from behind and you go, “what the hell?”  At least I did.  Again, an impressive run with a silly soundtrack.

In August of 2011 Toyota got into it.  I’ll admit I’m not a huge Toyota fan.  I’ve been off them ever since their handling of the acceleration issues in their conventional cars came to light.  That aside, this is a thrilling ride.  Their video is just a cockpit camera with real world sound.

The steering wheel looking like a video game controller is a bit distracting but then the sound of this thing starts to sink in and you know it’s going fast, very fast.

This is Electric Fast.

Toyota Motorsport GMBH Attacks the “Ring”

Saturday, August 27, 2011

IgnorantCarNut Video of the week

I have to admit I had just started looking when I came across this one.  I had to have this – I have the same flippin’ bear!

Watch for the bear!

Friday, August 26, 2011

Nutjob Comment of the Day: 8/26/2011

Any time your read a review of something you can be guaranteed that there is going to be a few notables in the comment section that shine above the rest.  This is not always a good thing.  Especially when a smart ass like me is actively looking for material.

The 2012 Camry is starting to show up and has already been reviewed in a number of places.  One place is by James Healey of USAToday.  Like most reviewers I don’t always agree with him.  There are times I think he is a flippin’ genius because he has picked out the exact same nuances I would have.  There are other times I question his membership in the human race.  But there is one thing I CAN say about him.

At least I can understand what the hell he’s typing.  The same cannot be said about those who post in the comment sections below his columns.  Case in point is a comment left just after his review of the 2012 Camry was posted.  Someone please translate for me:

Well quite biased anti Camry review with a lot of nonsense in it. I believe this review has no merit because the author does not have clear idea what he is reviewing - family sedan or sports car. Anther thing -complete lack of fairness - by selling author's own opinion as a holly truth. In general car's outside look should not be reviewed at all because the exterior perception is very subjective and individual. Does the author has knowledge and/or degree and/or experience in auto design? If not what is his credibility to talk about design at all? I basically found Sonata's exterior design terrible - for me Sonata exterior design is 100 percent kitsch, which may be some people loved form of art but for me is pathetic. So please start talking about technical parameters and stop moaning about great Sonata's exterior.

Posted on August 23, 2011.

I’m really not going into tearing this apart for two reasons.  First, every time I read it my brain starts to hurt.  Secondly, a regular in their comment section already did her best.  I will add one thing though.  From Webster:

Definition of kitsch:

  1. Something that appeals to popular or lowbrow taste and is often of poor quality
  2. A tacky or lowbrow quality or condition <teetering on the brink of kitsch - Ron Miller>

With that in mind here is one person’s definition of kitsch.

2012 Hyundai Sonata

sonata_overview

That being said the person is entitled to their own opinion even though James Healy apparently isn’t.

So I’ll let the gibberish above slide and go with this one for Nutjob Comment of the Day.  Taken from the same group of comments:

This guys a jerk

Posted on August 23, 2011

Clean, simple and to the point.  What it has to do with cars I have no idea.

(You may have noticed that I don’t usually mention the name of the poster.  I do give reference to where it is and if you like you can hunt it down.  I’m just gonna let the words speak for themselves.  And that’s the holly truth.)

Wednesday, August 24, 2011

Toyota: Reinventing Average

The 2012 Camry is starting to show up in the media and don’t worry.  There is nothing about this car that is going to offend you.  Or surprise you.  Or excite you.  Or even threaten you with an involuntary bowel movement.

It’s new, not all new as it carries over some power train parts as well as some other stuff.  The sheet metal has been redone and the interior is considerably upgraded.  Apparently it now competes with the Sonata.

Huh?  Shouldn’t that be the other way around.  it is the segment leading car, isn’t it?   By sales numbers it is.  By having a car roll up and say, “HOW YA DOIN’?!”  Not so much.  This car says things more like, “It’s all right,” “Don’t worry,” and “The Prozac is in the upper right pocket.”

It’s still god-awful boring.

2012 Toyota Camry

2010-Toyota-Camry-4

When I went looking for pics, about seventy-five percent were silver – ish.

It struck me that this is a somewhat exciting view.  It also struck me that this may be the view you would have if you had been struck by a lunatic leaving a mall parking lot after picking up the latest Britney Spears CD.  (A sane person would have already downloaded it thus avoiding you entirely.)

You may have noticed that this is not a review of the car itself, but mostly bitching and whining about what the car is.  Well, I’m a consumer, I don’t review cars.  I evaluate them based on what my needs are.  It’s all based on my feelings and a great deal of whimsy.

And whimsy says I don’t need this car.

Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Update 8/23/2011

Just a note that I’m still fleshing out the pages.  Added a new comparison on the Price Comparison page.  Interesting to know you could blow almost $22,000 on a Nissan Versa.

Added a couple to the Hot Wheels page as well.  The Chevy Nomad is there because I really do think it was designed by Mattel.  Come on.  Can you imagine this design pitch?

“No, really!  A station wagon with just two doors!”

It’s a great car but try saying that out loud.

The AMC Javelin AMX is there just because it’s cool.

And Hot Wheels are cool.

What’s it all about?

Now that I’ve made a couple of posts and gotten the other pages somewhat in order it’s now time to explain myself.  First I think it should be understood that I believe that humor comes at the expense of others.  Second it is a talent of mine to keenly point out what is and is not humorous.  And third, if you don’t recognize a smart ass when you see one then you probably need to look elsewhere.

This blog is obviously about cars, the automotive industry and those who are compelled to speak on it.  While I may ramble in seemingly odd directions at times I assure you it will all make sense.  But only to me.

My automotive experience is quite extensive.  I learned to drive in my Dad’s 1960 Triumph TR3A.  Anybody who can learn to drive using a British sports car with a six inch ground clearance AND doing it while heel and toeing deserves to write about cars.  (I also know the difference between the TR2, TR3 and TR3A.)

There will be several notable sections in this blog:

  • The Nutjob Comment of the Day:  Here I’ve found a gem of wisdom from somewhere on the internet and just had to share.  Wisdom should not be horded.   Only shoes and spam.
  • Hot Wheels:  Not a section on the toys themselves but real world cars that looked like they were designed by Mattel.  Yes, I know they may have Hot Wheels versions of them but that isn’t the point.
  • Price Comparisons: Sometimes I get board and shop for cars I will never buy.  Sometimes there’s a theme to what I’m looking for.  Sometimes I just feel like self-inducing nausea while window shopping.

Well, that’s about it.  As always feel free to comment.  Be warned though, you may have wisdom that screams to be shared with the world.

Monday, August 22, 2011

Nutjob Comment of the Day: 8/22/2011

This one is from Autoblog.com and is a few days old.  It comes under the heading, “Yeah, right.  Can I talk to someone else now?”

The comment:

**** kia! this car is completely stolen and is an identical copy of the Lamborghini Estoque sedan that lamborghini concept:
http://www.autoblog.com/photos/paris-2008-lamborghini-estoque-live/full/#photo-1070230/

Posted on August 18, 2011

The Lambo:

estoque_1      lamborghini-estoque-concept-img_5

And the Kia:

02-kia-sport-sedan-concept       01-kia-sport-sedan-concept630opt

If true it could be the first Kia to cost over $100,000.

Sunday, August 21, 2011

Nutjob Comment of the Day: 8/21/2011

Here we go.  To start off this comes from USAToday - a goldmine for this sort of thing.  In order to qualify for this distinct honor, you really just have to post a comment in any comment section I come across and sound like a complete ass.  It’s quite simple and everyone should give it a try.

Found on USAToday under the heading “Cadillac resurrects the big luxury barge in Ciel concept.”  First read the article so you don’t find yourself in Groingo’s company.  You may also want to research GM’s debt to the US.  Suffice it to say GM has repaid the majority of it’s debt.  There was some assumed by the bankrupt holding company.  That will not come back because it doesn’t have the money and GM does not want to assume that liability.  That’s what put them into bankruptcy in the first place.

Here’s the tasty tidbit that was posted in the comment section:

“Government Motors, spending heaps of taxpayer money, isn't it wonderful how GM seems to have so much money to burn on pointless cars that have absolutely no market?”

Posted on August 19, 2011.

You can tear this apart, from the lack of understanding about how General Motors would fund a concept car, the purpose of a concept car and the market position for Cadillac.  Instead, I would just like to point out that the author has managed to write this in a single sentence, and still managed to screw up how commas are used.

Article URL:

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/driveon/post/2011/08/cadillac-brings-back-the-big-luxury-barge-in-ciel-concept/1

Headlines designed to drive you nuts

Is the Chevy Volt losing its spark with consumers?

from the SeattleTimes.com, August 20, 2011

Lovely.  After reading the headline for this article you may think to yourself, “Gee, what’s wrong with the Chevrolet Volt?” and the answer is simple.  Nothing.  It’s what they said it would be and it costs as much as they said t would and it does what they said it would.  “They” being Chevrolet and General Motors.  And all other sentient beings on the planet.

So, why is it losing it’s spark?  Because it has entered the real world and reality has crept up on those who thought it was going to cure cancer and the common cold.  Just what is this real world issue that has leapt out of the shadows and yelled, “Boo!”

The price.

It hasn’t changed.

The tax credit is still just that, a tax credit,  not a discount at the time of sale.

Oh, and by the way, the Nissan Leaf is still only electric.

In case you had forgotten.

The article said so.